1
Named responsibility
Pages identify the writer and any educator reviewer when those roles are complete.
Editorial policy
Useful content, clear authorship, and no invented expertise
StudyBuddyAI publishes content to help families make better learning decisions. Search visibility is not enough reason to create a page: each resource must answer a real parent question and be accurate about its evidence, author, reviewer, and limits.
2
Evidence where it matters
Factual educational, safety, legal, and product claims use appropriate primary or expert sources.
3
Visible corrections
Material changes update the review date and, when useful, explain what changed.
Writing and review workflow
A content brief starts with a real audience question, intended outcome, scope, and source plan. Drafts are checked for originality, clarity, product accuracy, unsupported promises, and language quality before publication.
Content is only described as educator-reviewed when a named qualified reviewer has actually reviewed that version. Automated or AI assistance may support research and editing, but it is not presented as human expertise.
Quality and correction rules
Published resources are reviewed on a schedule and when product behaviour or reliable guidance changes.
- No fabricated authors, reviewers, testimonials, ratings, or statistics
- No changing dates solely to make content appear fresh
- No automated pages without distinct user value and human quality control
- Material concerns can be reported to support@getstudybuddyai.com
Have a correction or source question?
Send the page URL and a clear description of the concern to our support inbox.
Contact us